Results tagged ‘ San Francisco Giants ’
October 26, 2002 — a date that will live in San Francisco Giants’ fans infamy.
Two World Series championships really hasn’t diminished the sting of that day.
And as the Giants prepare to play Game 6 of the World Series on Tuesday against the Kansas City Royals, memories of Game 6 of the 2002 Series echo back to Giants fans.
The echo began after the Giants won Game 5 on Sunday. This fact dawned on me.
- The Giants won Game 1 on the road
- lost Game 2 on the road
- lost Game 3 at home
- won Game 4 at home
- won Game 5 at home
Do you know what Series I’m talking about? Yes, it is the 2014 World Series, but also the 2002 World Series.
Game 6s bring back plenty of bad memories for Giants fans.
In 1987, the Giants took a 3-2 series lead back to St. Louis in the NLCS and never scored another run the rest of the series, losing 1-0 in Game 6 when Candy Maldonado played a Tony Pena single into a triple, then couldn’t throw out the slow-running catcher on a sac fly to shallow right.
The next Game 6 the Giants played was in 2002.
Now, the Giants did exorcise a Game 6 demon in the 2010 NLCS. The Giants took a 3-2 series lead in Philadelphia, and the Giants sealed the series with a Game 6 on the road.
That game could be the road map to manager Bruce Bochy’s approach in this Game 6.
In the game in 2010, Bochy went to the bullpen early when Jonathan Sanchez, yanking him with no outs in the third inning. From there, Bochy went to Jeremy Affeldt, Madison Bumgarner (two inning on two days rest), Javier Lopez, Tim Lincecum (one-third of an inning on ONE day rest) and Brian Wilson to shut out the Phillies.
I don’t see Bochy going to Bumgarner in this Game 6. He made that move with Lincecum in Game 6 in 2002 because he had Matt Cain set to go in Game 7.
I don’t him with the same confidence in Tim Hudson (Wednesday’s Game 7 starter) as he had in Cain in 2010. So Bumgarner will lay in waiting for Wednesday.
But even with that, Game 6 of the 2002 Series lingers.
In Game 5 of the 2010 World Series, after the Giants had taken a 3-0 lead over the Rangers, FOX put up a graphic in the bottom of the seventh that the last time a team had blown a three-run lead or bigger in the seventh inning or later in the World Series was Game 6 of the 2002 Series.
The Giants held on in 2010 to win the World Series. They also won a Game 6 at home in the 2012 NLCS.
But for me, that Game 6 in 2002 still lingers.
In 2002, my wife and I had joined a church that spring. That October, the pastor and his wife invited us to dinner at their house. That dinner date was set weeks before knowing that the Giants would be playing in Game 6 of the World Series.
But the pastor, a baseball fan himself, said that they would have the game on at their house, so come on over. I did, reluctantly.
Things went well for a while. Looked really good at the seventh inning stretch.
But then things went bad. Really, really bad.
I sat stoically, saying nothing, as I watched the collapse.
The pastor’s wife commented: “Tim, I’m amazed with you. If this were happening to the Padres (the pastor’s team), Scott would be going nuts.”
I kept it together until I got home later that night. Then I went straight to my VCR, ejected the tape I used to record the game and smashed it on my backyard deck.
But 2014 is different.
The 2014 Giants don’t have a closer whose arm is about to fall off. Remember, that game in 2002 was the last of Robb Nen’s big-league career.
This year, the Giants are seeking their first World Series title in 48 years, as they were in 2002. It’s been only two years. A Game 6 loss would be far easier to swallow.
The 2014 Giants have Bruce Bochy as their manager. Bochy is 8-0 in postseason series as manager of the Giants and has postseason record with the Giants of 32-13. The 2002 Giants had Dusty Baker as manager. Baker was 2-3 in postseason series with the Giants and had a postseason record of 11-12. Game 7 was the last game Baker would manage with the Giants. And remember, Baker went on to manage the Cubs in 2003 when he was part of the “Bartman Game” in Game 6 of the NLCS.
This group of Giants are resilient. Many were part of the 2012 team that went 6-0 in elimination games. They’ve bounced back from nearly hitting rock bottom this season in June and July, and they continued to plug away when injuries nearly derailed them late in the season.
And most importantly … I won’t be watching this Game 6 at the house of my pastor.
The 2014 San Francisco Giants’ motto should be: “Somehow, Someway.”
The Giants’ inexplicable postseason run continued Saturday with a 3-0 win over the St. Louis Cardinals in Game 1 of the National League Championship Series.
The Giants again did not tear the ball of the cover. They did manage eight hits, but here is how they scored their three runs.
- A ducksnort bloop single off the Magic Wandoo of Travis Ishikawa.
- An error.
- A sacrifice fly.
And the Giants’ two-run “rally” in the second inning was started on a double by Pablo Sandoval that originally landed in the glove of Cardinals right fielder Randal Grichuk, but popped out after Grichuk hit the wall and then the ground.
The Giants’ third-inning run was aided when second baseman Kolten Wong failed to cleanly field a potential double-play ball off the bat of Hunter Pence. The Cardinals only got one out on the play, so no error, but it made Brandon Belt’s subsequent sacrifice fly possible.
This follows the Giants’ final four runs scored in the Division Series against the Nationals, which were scored on …
- A wild pitch.
- A groundout.
- A walk.
- A sacrifice fly.
The Giants even caught a break when Madison Bumgarner appeared to balk in a run in the seventh inning. But the umpires didn’t call a balk, probably because only the Giants are allowed to score a run on a balk.
It’s hard to figure.
The Giants went 15-61 in games in which they scored three runs or fewer. They were 73-13 when scoring four runs or more, second best in the NL this season (The Nationals had the best mark).
From June 3 to Aug. 25, the Giants went 1-35 in games in which they scored three runs or fewer.
But in the postseason, the Giants are now 4-1 in games in which they score three runs or fewer.
They have scored 12 runs total in their last five postseason games. Yet they find themselves with a 1-0 lead in the NLCS.
After going 5 for 40 (.125) with runners in scoring position in the series with the Nationals, the Giants added a 2-for-11 night with RISP on Saturday. And one of those hits didn’t score a run.
But here’s one stat to note. In the Division Series, the Giants struck out the fewest times of the four NL teams in the LDS round. And it’s not even close. The Nationals struck out 39 times in 172 plate appearances, the Cardinals struck out 37 times in 138 PAs, the Dodgers stuck out 36 times in 155 PAs and the Giants struck out 24 in 175 PAs.
And as the old adage goes “Good things happen when you put the ball in play.”
The other stat is the more obvious one: the pitching.
Giants pitching has an 1.14 ERA in the postseason.
The starting pitching has been even better: 0.64 ERA.
At some point, you have to expect the Giants bats to come alive.
Perhaps that will come in Game 2 on Sunday.
No matter what White Sox — or Andrew Baggarly — say, San Francisco Giants did not beat Chicago White Sox on a ‘technicality’
During last offseason, Major League Baseball wanted to implement a rule that would prevent home-plate collisions. The rule would be simple and straightforward.
The catcher is not allowed to block the plate. The runner is not allowed to blow up the catcher. The only time home-plate collisions would happen was when the flight of the ball drew the catcher into the runner’s path, making any collision accidental and unavoidable.
But that wasn’t good enough for old-school catchers and managers. They said “How can we teach our catchers how not to block the plate in just six weeks of spring training when that’s how they’ve been playing the position forever (forever meaning in their pro careers, because blocking the plate was not part of the game they played in Little League, high school or college)?”
So MLB waffled a bit, adding a line into the new rule that catchers could still block the plate, if they had possession of the ball. And a can of worms was opened.
Given that sliver of light, old-school managers did not worry about teaching their catchers about where best to position themselves to be in compliance with the new rule. They simply told their catchers to play the position as they have always played it, and make MLB rule that they were doing it incorrectly.
In the first half of the season, MLB gave catchers the benefit of the doubt. The onus was on the runner to avoid contact. Catchers kept blocking the plate like they always had.
But then runners started to complain. Was there a new rule or wasn’t there one? And MLB started to listen. So after the All-Star break, we started to see a swing in how these plays were being ruled on replay.
If the catcher was in the runners path without the ball and didn’t give the runner a path to the plate, the runner would be ruled safe. It didn’t matter how far ahead of the runner that the ball arrived to the plate.
In short, if teams weren’t going to get their catchers to position themselves correctly in compliance with the new rule, MLB was going to do it for them.
And if you’re on the wrong end of one of these calls, you don’t like it. Just like White Sox manager Robin Ventura found himself in when umpires overturned a call in which the Giants’ Gregor Blanco was thrown out at the plate in the seventh inning on Tuesday.
The play resulted in a 1-1 tie, and the Giants went on to score six more times in the inning en route to a 7-1 win. And Ventura was livid.
“You look at the spirit of the rule of what they’re trying to do and what it’s actually doing, and it’s a joke,” said Ventura, who was ejected for arguing and kicking dirt on the plate after a review that lasted nearly five minutes. “We obviously disagreed with it, and we got hosed today.”
Ventura continued: “They don’t take into consideration that the guy was out by a longshot.”
Whoa! Whoa! Whoa! At what point did Ventura start to disagree with this rule. If you rewind back to Tuesday night’s game, Ventura found himself on the opposite end of a similar play.
In the 10th inning, Chicago’s Jordan Danks were ruled out at the plate on a tag by Buster Posey. Ventura came out to have the play to review to see if Posey blocked Danks’ path to the plate, even though Danks was out by a longshot.
One problem, however. The review showed that Posey didn’t block the plate, that he did leave Danks a pathway to the plate.
And why is this? Well, it’s because that’s how the Giants have taught their catchers to position themselves on plays on the plate. They instruct their catchers to get out IN FRONT OF home plate, between home plate and the pitchers mound, field the throw, then apply a sweep tag. That’s what Posey did.
Now fast-forward to Wednesday afternoon. White Sox catcher Tyler Flowers did not get out in front of home plate. He stood right over it. And when he went to field the throw from first baseman Jose Abreu, Flowers left leg clearly blocked off the entire plate from the oncoming Blanco. Flowers even admitted this much, but said that’s not the point.
Except it IS the point.
Some have said the Giants won Wednesday on a “technicality” including CSN Bay Area’s Andrew Baggarly, who called the ruling “lasso-sized legal loophole.”
This is what Flowers said: “I don’t think anybody has an understanding of this rule,. That’s not the purpose of this rule. The purpose of this rule is to prevent a situation like Posey had. It’s not when a guy is out by 30 feet. ‘Oh, he blocked the plate?’ That had no impact on him being safe or out. And there’s no clarification on that.”
There. Flowers just proved my point, even if he didn’t intend to, when he said “this rule is to prevent a situation like Posey had. It’s not when a guy is out by 30 feet.”
Flowers was referring to the Scott Cousins play — I call it the Cousins play because the responsibility for that collision was completely on Cousins — that prematurely Posey’s season in May 2011.
Here are three irrefutable points about the Cousins/Posey play.
- Posey was NOT blocking the plate on that play.
- Posey DID leave Cousins a lane to the plate.
- Cousins did believe he would be out by 30 feet. He felt that from where right fielder Nate Schierholtz was throwing the ball, Cousins would be out easily. His only recourse was to try to dislodge the ball from Posey. As it turned out, Posey got caught with a short hop that he didn’t handle cleanly.
And that’s the point of the new rule. MLB wants catchers to leave runners a lane, so they don’t feel like their only course of action is collide with the catcher. And leaving a lane is all determined by where the catcher sets up to receive the throw.
So here’s another question for Flowers. If Blanco was going to be out by a longshot, why was Flowers even blocking the plate in the first place?
“I had two seconds to get from behind home plate to catch (and) make a tag, and I’m supposed to be able to make sure I don’t block the plate, catch the ball and make the tag, all within two seconds on an infield dribbler?” Flowers said. “That’s not realistic. That play doesn’t make any sense.”
But it is realistic, if it’s a play that you have been trained on doing correctly. Buster Posey had time to do it correctly Tuesday night because he’s been trained to do that. Flowers, likely because the White Sox have not made it a priority, appeared as if he hasn’t been trained on this.
So MLB gave him, and the White Sox, a valuable lesson. And they got what they deserved.
And that’s not a technicality.
The Associated Press reported Saturday that the San Francisco Giants are finalizing a deal to bring veteran pitcher Jake Peavy to the Giants.
Details are still being worked out, according to the report. But the Red Sox will reportedly get minor league pitchers Heath Hembree and Edwin Escobar.
The details being worked out likely involve money and other provisions. Peavy is making $14.5 million this season with the Red Sox, meaning he is still owed about $6 million. He has a player option of $15 million for 2015, but he is unlikely to reach the milestones to make that option vest. He would basically have to double his current innings output of 124 innings this season to allow that option to kick in.
Normally when Giants GM Brian Sabaen makes these midseason deals, I reserved judgment, preferring to defer to his better judgment.
The Giants have made several midseason deals over the past few years. Not all of the deals have worked out as the Giants hoped, but at least the Giants didn’t have to give up much to get them.
I wrote about this earlier, listing the prospects the Giants have given up in midseason deals the past five years. Really, only Zack Wheeler has amounted to anything, and the jury is still out on him.
But I’m going to say now that I don’t like this deal. To me, it represents of harbinger of bad news.
And here’s why.
CAIN SITUATION MUST BE BAD: When Matt Cain went on the disabled list after the All-Star break, manager Bruce Bochy said Cain could be down “one week, two weeks …. eight weeks. We just don’t know.” The Giants have been cagy with health reports of their players. So when they say they don’t know, we have to conclude they at least suspect. And the consumation of this deal must indicate they suspect that Cain may not return this season.
THE PRICE WAS TOO HIGH: In giving up Escobar and Hembree, the Giants parted with their No. 2 and No. 11 prospects, according to MLB.com’s preseason list of prospects. Both pitchers have appeared to be on the fast track to the majors in recent spring trainings. Escobar, 22, was thought to be in position to get a call-up this season, but he’s had a rough season in Triple-A. He’s 3-8 with 5.11 ERA and 96 strikeouts in 111 innings at Fresno. Hembree, 25, was thought to be the Giants “closer of the future” a couple of springs ago. But this season represents his third at the Triple-A level. He is 1-3 with 3.89 ERA, 18 saves and 46 strikeouts in 39.1 innings this season with Fresno. He was recently named a PCL All-Star. He did have a brief stint with the Giants in 2013, throwing 7.2 scoreless innings with 12 strikeouts. So I might have been OK giving up one of these two pitchers, along with some lower-level prospects, for Peavy. But giving up both?
THIS AIN’T THE SAME JAKE PEAVY: This has not been a good season for Peavy, 33, in Boston. He’s 1-9 with 4.72 ERA in 20 starts. He leads the American League in home runs allowed with 20. Here are most stats for 2014 to sample
- His ERA+ of 83 is the lowest of his big-league career.
His FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching) of 4.81 is his highest since his second big-league season in 2003 when he was 22.
His WHIP of 1.427 is the highest of his career.
His Hit Allowed Rate of 9.5 is the second highest of his career.
His HR Allowed Rate of 1.5 is the highest of his career.
His Walk Rate of 3.3 is his highest since 2002.
His Strikeout Rate of 7.3 is his lowest since 2002.
Looking for good news?
The Giants are clearly hoping that a return to the National League, where he hasn’t pitched since 2009, will do Peavy good. His four starts against NL teams this season have all been quality starts.
They are also hoping that pitching in AT&T Park will provide better results than pitching in Fenway.
Well, Peavy is 14-2 with 2.21 ERA against the Dodgers in his career also looked good to the Giants. Although it should be pointed out that most of those starts occurred in 2009 or earlier when Peavy was a different pitcher and the Dodgers were a different team. Peavy did limit the Dodgers to one run on three hits in a complete game win in Dodger Stadium last August.
And for good news, Peavy make be on the mound when the Giants face the Dodgers on Sunday night, instead of Yusmeiro Petit.
All of the talk around San Francisco these days revolves around one question.
“Is Tim Lincecum back?”
After two Cy Young seasons and two world championship seasons, Giants fans want to know if The Freak is back to his form from 2008-11 after a very bumpy stretch since 2012.
Well, one way to answer that question is to say Tim Lincecum has, in fact, never been better.
After his past four starts since June 25, Tim Lincecum’s stats are as follows …
- 30.1 innings pitched
- 10 hits allowed
- 1 earned run
- 9 walks
- 24 strikeouts
- 0.30 ERA
Now compare that to his best four-start stretches over his career.
July 16-Aug. 1, 2007: 2-0, 26.1 IP, 14 H, 4 ER, 13 BB, 26 K, 1.37 ERA
April 19-May 4, 2008: 2-1, 27.1 IP, 24 H, 3 ER, 11 BB, 23 K, 0.99 ERA (3 scoreless outings out of four)
Aug. 12-27, 2008: 3-0, 27.2 IP, 13 H, 3 ER, 12 BB, 35 K, 0.98 ERA
July 27-Aug. 12, 2009: 2-0, 32.2 IP, 21 H, 4 ER, 6 BB, 37 K, 1.10 ERA
April 5-23, 2010: 4-0, 27 IP, 19 H, 3 ER, 6 BB, 32 K, 1.00 ERA
May 4-21, 2011: 2-1, 29.2 IP, 21 H, 3 ER, 11 BB, 30 K, 0.91 ERA (3 scoreless outings out of 4)
July 9-28, 2011: 3-1, 25 IP, 15 H, 3 ER, 15 BB, 26 K, 1.08 ERA
Aug. 7-24, 2011: 3-1, 29.2 IP, 18 H, 3 ER, 11 BB, 29 K, 0.91 ERA
Clearly, he’s never had a four-game stretch that was as good as his current run in terms of run prevention. In fact, it’s not even close.
It’s also important to note that his strikeout rate on the current stretch is not as high as in his previous impressive stretches.
But also in only two of the previous stretches did Lincecum give up fewer walks than his current streak, and in none of his previous stretches did he allow fewer hits than his current one. Again, it’s not even close.
So is Tim Lincecum back to being the pitcher he was in 2008-11.
No. He’s a different pitcher. But he’s getting the results.
Now some folks out there are still a bit skeptical, and they take Lincecum’s recent run with a grain of salt.
Freak me once, shame on you. Freak me twice …
They’ll point out that with all of his recent success, his ERA still sits at 3.66. Lincecum hasn’t had an in-season ERA that low (after May 1) since the end of the 2011 season.
But consider this. If you remove Lincecum’s two worst starts of the season (April 9 vs. Arizona, 4 IP, 7 ER; June 3 vs. Cincinnati, 4.1 IP, 8 ER), and Lincecum’s ERA drops down to 2.86. That represents 17 of his 19 starts.
Also consider he has posted quality starts in six of his past seven starts (just missing one — 6 IP, 4 ER — vs. Arizona on June 20), and in nine of his past 12 starts. And one of those non-quality starts was when he was lifted after 96 pitches despite throwing five scoreless innings vs. the Cubs.
Yes, Lincecum still has a big home-road disparity in his numbers. But 9 of his last 12 starts at home. So it’s hard to tell if his recent success is due to pitching so often at home, or if his high road numbers are due to the fact that he made four road starts prior to May 8, and only three since, when he has started to figure out how to pitch without being overpowering.
So while the jury is still out for some, we are impressed and encouraged by Lincecum’s recent success.
Will he be the Cy Young-winning super stud of 2008-09?
Maybe not. But can he be a top-of-the-rotation quality starter?
We’re beginning to think “yes.”
April showers bring May flowers. What do May flowers bring?
Well, for the San Francisco Giants, significant injuries. At least that’s been true over the past few seasons.
Mark DeRosa, Buster Posey, Pablo Sandoval, Ryan Vogelsong, Angel Pagan. All suffered significant injuries that cost them weeks of playing time in May.
Wednesday’s injury may have been the most frustrating.
In the top of the ninth, after he had just escaped a bases-loaded jam with the help of a double play ball, Santiago Casilla came to the plate for the first time since 2012.
Manager Bruce Bochy said afterwards that he gave Casilla instructions not to swing. But Casilla went up there hacking, working the count full before hitting a chopper up the middle. Rockies shortstop Troy Tulowitzki charged the ball and threw to first. Casilla raced down the baseline with his hair on fire, as if they play were in Game 7 of the World Series.
It was a game in May, and the Giants were leading 5-1. Just before he reached the bag, Casilla pulled up, then fell over the bag and began writhing in pain. Casilla suffered a hamstring injury so bad that he could not put wait on the leg and had to be helped off the field by two trainers.
And this came after starter Matt Cain left the game early when he felt his hamstring tighten up.
Casilla is definitely going on the DL. For how long, we won’t know until an MRI is performed Thursday. But it didn’t look good. By the looks of things, if the Giants get Casilla back before the All-Star break, they would be lucky.
But it seems to follow a disturbing trend of key injuries suffered by Giants in the month of May.
Here’s a look back at others since 2010:
Mark DeRosa: Prior to the 2010 season, Mark DeRosa signed a two-year, $12 million deal to be a veteran presence in the lineup. But in May of 2010, DeRosa went on the DL with a wrist injury that ended his 2010 season after playing 26 games in 2010. He came back to play 47 games in 2011, mostly as a reserve. He also started a DL stint in May 2011.
Edgar Renteria: Renteria went on the DL twice in May 2010, the first on May 7 with a strained groin. He returned May 22, played three games then went back on the DL with a strained hamstring for about a month. He would return, suffer other injuries, but return in the postseason to deliver one of the biggest hits in Giants history in Game 5 of the World Series.
Buster Posey: The biggest May injury was Posey’s season-injury ankle injury on May 26 when he got plowed by Scott Cousins.
Jeremy Affeldt: Affeldt went on the DL May 2 with a sprained knee sustained when his 4-year-old son lept into his arms after Affeldt returned home after a game. Now, granted, the injury occurred in late April, but Affeldt went on the DL in May. Affeldt missed the minimum, so it wasn’t major injury, but worth mentioning.
Pablo Sandoval: Almost a year after breaking the hamate bone in his right hand, Sandoval breaks the hamate bone in his left hand, leaving a game early against the Marlins on May 2. He would be out until June 9.
Santiago Casilla: This isn’t the first time Casilla visited the DL in May. Last season, he went on DL on May 21 with a cyst in his right knee and did not return from the DL until July 14.
Ryan Vogelsong: Vogelsong was off to a bad start in 2013. But he looked to be turning things around with his best start of the season, throwing five shutout innings against the Nationals. Then he broke his hand swinging at a pitch at the plate. He would be out until Aug. 9.
Angel Pagan: Pagan supplied perhaps the most exciting play of the 2013 season for the Giants when he won a game against the Rockies with a 10th-inning, inside-the-park home run. But Pagan hurt his hamstring on the play on May 25. They waited until June 7 to put him on the DL. He tried to return later in June, but aggravated the injury on June 20 playing for Class San Jose. He would later have surgery and be out until Aug. 30.
Brandon Belt: Belt went on the DL after suffering a broken thumb when he was hit by a pitch from the Dodgers’ Paul Maholm on May 9. He’s not expected back until late June, at the earliest.
Giants fans are always on the lookout for the next hot prospect in their farm system.
Well, this week at least, Basseball America says that’s Andrew Susac.
Susac worked his way onto the list with a week in which he hit 6 for 19 (.316) with four home runs, 7 RBI, two walks and six strikeouts.
Susac is now hitting .314 for the season with a .404 OBP and 1.015 OPS. In 22 games in Fresno, he’s now hit half as many home runs (six) than he did last season at Double-A Richmond (12).
Now, Fresno is a hitter-friendly environment, and Richmond is more pitcher-friendly. But the offensive spike for Susac is encouraging, considering that it followed a stretch when he missed some time with concussion-like symptoms after taking a foul ball to the mask.
Still, John Manuel of Baseball America has been impressed.
“I saw him in the fall league last year, and I knew we were light on him in our rankings and in our Giants top 10 rankings,” Manuel said on MLB Network’s The Rundown. “He should have been in the Giants top 10 prospects.”
It’s worth noting that CSN Bay Area’s Andrew Baggarly supplied those rankings to Baseball America.
“He’s got power the other way,” Manuel said. “I saw him hit a home run to right-center field at Scottsdale Stadium while doing a game on (MLB Network). I could see him in the big leagues sooner than later with Brandon Belt on the disabled list.”
Matt Yallof of MLB Network noted that at 24 the clock was ticking on Susac as a prospect.
But not really. When the Giants drafted Susac in the second round of the 2011, he was recovering from a knee injury that ended his season at Oregon State.
Susac did not play in 2011. He played 2012 in Class A San Jose (hitting .244 with 9 HRs in 102 games) and 2013 in Double-A Richmond (.256 with 12 HRs in 84 games). So he’s right where he needs to be in his first season in Triple-A.
As far as getting a call-up to the bigs? Well, like Adam Duvall, the Giants would rather see Susac continue to get regular at-bats and playing time in Fresno than ride the bench in San Francisco. Improving his defense is something the Giants would like to see from Susac.
But he does become a viable option if the Giants need his bat later this season.
Other prospects in Fresno
- 3B ADAM DUVALL: Duvall continues to tear it up. He’s hitting .359 with .419 OBP and an OPS of 1.419 over the past 10 games, with 6 HRs and 14 RBI. He’s been playing a little bit at 1B while the Grizzlies other 1B has been on the mend.
- 2B JOE PANIK: Panik has cooled a little, hitting .282 over the past 10 games. He’s still hitting .314 for the season with a .381 OBP. He has 16 walks against 18 strikeouts. With Marco Scutaro out, Panik remains an option should something happen to Brandon Hicks.
- OF GARY BROWN: Uh oh. After a good start to the season, Brown has begun to slip. He’s hitting .179 (7 for 39) over the past 10 games. He’s hitting .267 for the season with 31 Ks against 15 BBs.
- P EDWIN ESCOBAR: Escobar was thought to be at the front of the line to get called up if the Giants needed a starter. But he’s struggled this season (1-4, 5.18 ERA). Opponents are hitting .308 against this season. The PCL is a hitter friendly league but you’d like to see better numbers than that from Escobar.
- P CHRIS HESTON: Heston may have been in Escobar’s position last year, but struggled with a 5.80 ERA. He’s 3-2 with 3.40 ERA this season with 31 strikeouts against 10 walks. He’s allowed 15 earned runs, but many of those runs have scored on the five home runs he’s allowed in seven starts.
Home runs have been coming fast and furious for the Giants this season, and that means More Splash Hits.
Of course, we like that.
Brandon Crawford belted the 66th Splash Hit at AT&T Park in the Giants’ 10-4 win over the Braves on Wednesday.
It came on the heels of Tyler Colvin hitting the 65th Splash Hit in Monday’s win over the Braves.
It’s the first time two Splash Hits have been hit so close to another since Barry Bonds smacked Splash Hits on consecutive days on April 12 and 13, 2004.
Here are some other fun facts about the Giants and Splash Hits this season:
- With three Splash Hits this season, it’s the first time the Giants have had that many in a season since hitting five in 2011, and it’s only May 15.
- It is only the second time that the Giants have hit three Splash Hits by May 14. The other time was in 2000, the season the park opened, when Barry Bonds hit two Splash Hits in one game on May 10 to give him three for the season.
- It’s the second time two different Giants have hit Splash Hits two days apart since Felipe Crespo and Bonds hit Splash Hits on May 28 and May 30, 2001.
- Colvin became the first Giant to hit a Splash Hit in his home debut with the Giants.
- Colvin became the 18th different player to record a Splash Hit (Splash Hits are defined as home runs into the bay hit by a Giants player).
- Crawford moved into a six-way tie for fourth on the all-time list of Splash Hits with his second.
- If Crawford hits another Splash Hit this season, he will become the second player to record three or more in a second. Bonds did it five times (six in 2000, nine in 2001, six in 2002, six in 2003, four in 2004).
Why so many people were dead wrong about the game-winning play and review for Pirates in win over San Francisco Giants
Now, that was a tough way for a six-game winning streak to end.
A two-out triple and error allowed Starling Marte to race around the bases and score the winning run in a 2-1 win for the Pittsburgh Pirates over the San Francisco Giants on Tuesday.
To make matters worse, Marte was called out at the plate, but the call was reversed on replay — the first time that a game has been decided by a review reversal.
You had to figure it would happen to Giants.
There was a lot of conjecture and debate about the final play on talk radio and Twitter, as Giants fans were looking for someone to pin the blame on.
So let’s look at the suspects:
HUNTER PENCE: Some fans said that Pence could have played the ball better off the wall in right. The ball bounced away from Pence after hitting the wall, allowing Marte to take third.
I believe Pence misjudged the carry on this ball. When it came off Marte’s bat, I thought that Pence would catch the ball on the warning track. I think Pence thought the same thing, which put him in a bad spot to play the ball off the wall.
So could he have played the ball better? Yes. But really it would have meant the difference between Marte at second or Marte at third. And with two out, a base hit is the most likely way Marte would have scored with two out. And a hit to the outfield scores Marte from second or third.
TIM HUDSON: Other fans said that Hudson should have been in a better position to back up the throw to third.
Again, OK, fine. But as a veteran pitcher, I don’t really think that Hudson thought there would be or should have been a throw into third. Is that an excuse? Not really. On a play like that, there’s no other place a pitcher should be than backing up a throw into third on a ball hit to right. But I’m not about to pin this one on Hudson, given the way he pitched when the Giants needed him to give the bullpen some much needed rest.
PABLO SANDOVAL: Given his struggles at the plate, fans are just looking for a reason to make The Panda into The Goat. But not on this play. Fans said Sandoval should have done all he could to block the ball. But the throw was a bad one, forcing Sandoval to lunge for the ball. He actually did a great job to get up quickly, get to the ball and make a spot-on throw home. Sandoval was not at fault.
BUSTER POSEY: This one drove me the most nuts. Fans were howling that Posey should have blocked Marte’s path to the plate. Some were blaming the new rule on blocking the plate, in which case they were wrong TWICE. For one, the new rule does not prevent a catcher from blocking the plate once he has the ball, and on this play, Posey had the ball early enough to block the plate within the rules. Secondly, regardless of the rule and what it allows, the Giants have instructed Posey for more than two years to avoid contact at the plate. Even if it means allowing a run — even the winning run — to score, they would much rather have a healthy Posey. And that’s the right call. Other fans thought Posey should have made a better tag, placing the tag on the hand or arm and not on the body. Well, looking at the replay, Posey did attempt to tag Marte on his left hand or arm, but Marte alerted pulled that hand back to his body to avoid the tag, leaving Posey to tag his chest. That allowed Marte to slip his right hand onto the plate.
If there was a way to fault Posey, it was his positioning at the plate. When Posey took the throw, he was standing right over home plate. When Marte came in with his slide, Posey backed away from him to avoid contact, applying the tag in a matador-like style. Again, this is likely a by-product of the Giants telling him to avoid contact. But a better way of that to happen is for Posey to position himself in fair territory and up the line to third to shorten the length of the thrown from Sandoval. This would have given Marte a lane to the plate, as the rule stipulates, but would have allowed Posey to make the tag earlier. The only question here is whether Posey could have done that and still retained a line of sight from Sandoval.
THE UMPIRES: Other fans were screaming that they hate replay. But I can assure you, that if the replay had allowed the Giants to win, they would love it. Replay is here to make sure calls are correct. As Jon Miller said in the post-game, in the entire history of the game, that play would have been called out because the throw beat Marte to the plate. It wouldn’t have mattered where the tag was, unless Marte made a more obvious attempt to avoid the tag. But now, with replay, it matters where the tag is. And that’s the way it should be.
The Giants were saying afterward they thought the replay was inconclusive and should not have been overturned. That’s more their hearts talking. The Giants had a play reviewed earlier this season ruled inconclusive that the Giants felt clearly showed that the call on the field should have been overturned. But that was in the first couple of weeks of the season, when the replay ump was far more reluctant to overturn calls on the field. But now they are willing to make the closer calls on replay. And in this case, the replay showed he was safe.
EHIRE ADRIANZA: If you were looking for the real culprit, you should look no further than Adrianza. This was another case of situational baseball, much like the plays earlier this season by Sandoval when he charged a slow roller and made an ill-advised and errant throw to first, allowing a run to score. The best play here would have been to eat the ball. The situation would have been different had their been one out or no outs. A runner at third with less than two outs is a much different situation. It’s a risk vs. reward situation, and the reward goes up with less than two outs. But with two outs, you don’t need to be a hero. You need to trust your pitcher to get that third out. There really wasn’t a play on Marte at third, and the risk of something bad happening outweighed the reward.
The Giants had hit a home run in their last 11 consecutive games entering Monday’s game in Pittsburgh.
They had hit 21 home runs over that 11-game span.
Home runs had accounted for 30 of the 49 runs the Giants scored over that 11-game span.
Home runs had accounted for 32 of the last 38 runs the Giants had scored on the road since April 5.
But that all ended Monday in the most unusual fashion.
The Giants rallied from an 8-2 deficit and beat the Pittsburgh Pirates 11-10 in 13 innings, extending their current win streak to six games.
They smacked out 20 hits — none of which were home runs.
It was the first time since July 25, 1961 that the Giants had 20 or more hits in a game without hitting a home run. That was a 16-7 win in, of all places, Pittsburgh.
Forbes Field was a monstrous field, nothing like PNC Park.
Bruce Bochy flushed his bench by the ninth inning, burning Juan Perez and Ehire Adrianza as pinch-runners. Perez stayed in the game for left-fielder Michael Morse.
Madison Bumgarner was used as a pinch-hitter. He grounded out. Santiago Casilla threw 40 pitches in two innings of relief, including a 14-pitch at-bat to Neil Walker that ended with a strikeout.
Angel Pagan had three hits, so did Hunter Pence, so did Buster Posey. Hector Sanchez had four hits.
And with all those hits, the Giants’ game-winning rally in the 13th produced a run without a hit. The key plate appearance was made by a relief pitcher — Jean Machi — who had just one previous plate appearance in the big leagues. That was last season. He struck out.
He only had two at-bats in the minors. But he got a hit — a double and an RBI.
The weirdness for Machi started on the mound.
Machi entered the game in the 11th inning. After allowing a single to Andrew McCutchen and striking out Pedro Alvarez, he fielded a comebacker by Sterling Marte. Machi turned and threw to second, but his throw hit umpire Jerry Davis for an error. Machi then got Ike Davis to hit into an inning-ending double play.
In the 12th inning, Gerrit Cole hit a comebacker to Machi, who deflected the ball to second baseman Brandon Hicks, allowing Cole to reach on an infield single.
After striking out Jose Tabata, Machi deflected another ball hit up the middle, one that would have been a custom-made double play to Hicks. Instead, the deflected ball allowed Jordy Mercer to reach on an infield single.
Then Machi got Chris Stewart to hit into an inning-ending double play.
In the top of the 13th, Hunter Pence started things with a one-out walk. Then Perez, and his whopping .059 batting average, received a gift. He was hit by a pitch.
Manager Bruce Bochy then left Machi in the game to sacrifice the runners over, something he’s never even attempted in 13 seasons of professional baseball.
Machi put down the perfect bunt. Pitcher Jared Hughes fielded the bunt, slipped a bit on the grass, then threw errantly to first, allowing Pence to score the go-ahead run.
Then after Sanchez struck out, Machi advanced to second on defensive indifference — not a stolen base. The rally ended after an intentional walk to Brandon Belt and a strikeout by Brandon Hicks.
After Sergio Romo locked down the save, Machi found himself leading the National League in wins by improving his mark to 5-0 on the season.
Jean Machi is now 5-0 with a 0.53 ERA. And one sacrifice bunt.
All this from a guy who was best known to Giants fans for breaking wind in the bullpen after getting called up to Triple-A last season.